FREE Subscription The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter   
At Last, New Rules Set for Grass-Fed Meat
The Department of Agriculture has announced standards that would for the first time allow meat to be labeled as grass fed only if it came from animals that ate nothing but grass after being weaned.

Grass-fed meat has become more popular and widely raised in the past few years. Many of those who buy it consider it better for the environment than meat from animals raised on grain in huge lots, and healthier, because it is believed to have higher levels of Omega-3 fats. Some people also find it tastier.

Sources:



Did you find this article interesting?
Article's Comment     ( 14 Comments )
 
 
 +23 Points           
 
Author of the Article
BY tammyinmo   
  
[ Joined on 03/07 ]
[ Posted on October 22, 2007 ]
Post Reply
As a small farmer that raises grass fed lamb and goat meat and plans to start raising beef soon, I am totally opposed to the USDA regulating the term grass fed.  Eventually, you will have to pay for certification and the small farmer that is truly raising pastured meats will not be able to call their meats grass fed because they won't be able to comply with the costly regulations. The only ones that will remain are the big corporations and they will be able to raise the animals on dirt for half the year, feeding hay instead of corn if they choose to do so, based on the information in the article that you referenced.  Our livestock is on pasture 24 hours per day, 365 days per year.  They do get hay from about January till March, but they are still on pasture and they will eat what still manages to grow. They are not confined to a small area that turns into a muddy mess. They get no antibiotics, hormones or even chemical wormers. We don't use artificial fertilizers, herbicides or pesticides on our land, but the term organic is out of our reach as a small farmer. I'd like to be able to continue to call my animals grass fed without costly government interference.

The term organic is now pretty much meaningless and getting worse by the day.  As a small farmer, it isn't worth the expense and hassle to go through the USDA certification process, so I can't call my produce organic unless I only sell less than $1000 per year.  The organic certification process means small guys lose and big corporations get to take over the market.  The same thing will happen to the term grass fed if the USDA is involved.
 

 +4 Points           
 
Author of the Article
BY Aaltrude   
  
[ Joined on 04/07 ]
Author of the Article [ Posted on October 22, 2007 ]
 
I live in New Zealand where dairy cows are grass fed. Our small organic farm is bordered on one side by a dairy farm and the cows are frequently in these paddocks as they are rotated around the farm.

Tammyinmo - I agree with you about the USDA certification. If we notice a product has been USDA certified, we will not buy it. We are also trying to spread the message about the unreliability of this certification as the most powerful way to show that consumers do not trust this certification is to not buy the food.

 
 +15 Points           
 
Author of the Article
BY "David"   
  
[ Joined on 08/06 ]
[ Posted on October 20, 2007 ]
Post Reply
Crazy world.....in which more people understand the crucial importance of what we feed animals.....but not it appears, what they consume as a human animal !!
If all animals, including us, only ate what nature designed us to, many health issues would disappear...
...and if we eat animals that have consumed the same kind of bad carbs that compromise our health, then we have the wonderful situation of unhealthy people...eating unhealthy animals. 
 

 +5 Points           
 
Author of the Article
BY shiva   
  
[ Joined on 10/06 ]
Author of the Article [ Posted on October 20, 2007 ]
 
david - - Well said. This article neglects to explain to the reader that perhaps the main concern that aware consumers have with eating grain fed beef is the fact that the animals are not designed by nature to digest grains. This results in the development of infections in the digestive system and thus the need for anti-biotics. ... The other negative impact of the grain feed is a meat that is higher in unhealthy fat (with the intention of creating a more tender, higher weight and thus more profitable product).. .... All of this is passed on to the body which eats the meat.

 
 +14 Points           
 
Author of the Article
BY foxtroter   
  
[ Joined on 09/06 ]
[ Posted on October 19, 2007 ]
Post Reply
I guess us folks that live in a rural area are lucky.  We just drive out and meet the farmer and personally pick out the cow.  He takes it to the butcher and we just go pick up the cow cut, frozen and vacuum packed in just the way we choose.  We get about 1/4 in steaks, 1/4 in roasts, 1/4 in hamburger (one pound packages and/or burger patties) and 1/4 in other things (soup bones with lots of meat on them etc).  We also get two boxes of bones that our neighbors's dogs love.  It works out that we pay $2.50 to $3.00 a pound, depending on the cow--not counting all the bones as a bonus.


No antibiotics or hormones and the meat is very tender and better tasting than any supermarket meet.  Even the tough stew meat cuts are tender.  The cows are butchered when they are only about a year old,  just before they would normally be taken to a feed lot.  I sometimes split a cow with one or two other people if someone doesn't want a whole cow at the time.