FREE Subscription The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter   
Buy a Big Mac, Get an Antibiotic at No Charge!

Talk about finding truths in strange places. I suspect you'll laugh (but a bit nervously) after reading this parody from The Onion about children receiving their "healthy dose" of antibiotics from the meats served at McDonald's, Wendy's or Burger King.

With a wink to all the antibiotics present in much of the fast foods Americans eat, luminaries like former Secretary of Health and Human Services Tommy Thompson "recommend" a Quarter-Pounder or Chicken McNuggets, chock full of amoxicillin and growth hormones to "cure" a strep throat and speed up a child's physical development.

The Onion


Dr. Mercola's Comment:

This parody smartly mixes fact with fiction to make you think about the hidden impact of the deep-fried processed foods you eat every day on your health.

The truth about the effect of antibiotics on the food chain and your health -- leading to hospital infections in some cases -- is far more sobering and harmful, however.

Remember that organic, antibiotic-free meats are actually less contaminated with bacteria, and are also free from pesticides and hormones. The animals are also raised more humanely.

Related Articles:




Did you find this article interesting?
Article's Comment     ( 17 Comments )
 
 
 +22 Points           
 
Author of the Article
BY Dr. David Spitz   
  
[ Joined on 12/06 ]
[ Posted on March 15, 2007 ]
Post Reply
Unfortunately, Americans really don't know what they are getting when they eat beef in a restaurant. Most beef is loaded with antibiotics & hormones. In addition, grain-fed beef (most of beef in America) sounds healthy, but is not. Before I understood this, I remember going into a fancy steak house and seeing 'corn-fed-beef' on the door and thinking, I'm eating healthy beef!

Dr. Mercola has done a good job of advancing the benefits of grass-fed-beef. But, sadly most of us are still confused and mis-informed.

By eating a diet rich in grass-fed-meats (be careful---some meat is sold as grass-fed and topped off with grain the last 3 months or so) you can be sure you are getting beneficial omega 3 fatty acids and CLA (conjugated linoleic acid).

Finally, if you have not seen the movie SuperSize Me, I suggest you see it tonight. You will never allow your kids to eat at McDonalds again.
 

 +9 Points           
 
Author of the Article
BY Leesh   
  
[ Joined on 09/06 ]
Author of the Article [ Posted on March 15, 2007 ]
 
I've never liked McDonalds, but after I saw Super Size Me I was pretty much done with all fast food for good. Honestly, fast food shouldn't even be considered a food. Unfortunately, most parents where I live let their kids live on that junk!  I was a pre-K teacher and they'd bring their kids in with a breakfast consisting of a Egg McMuffin, Starbucks cookie, Jack in The Box tater tots and pasteurized milk or watered down sugar called orange juice. For lunch? They'd bring/pack them some "chicken" nuggets. I'd always ask the kids what they had for dinner...it was just as bad or worse! Everyday my stomach would turn. And these parents wondered why their kids had behavioral issues and why they were so sluggish!!!!!

Thankfully as teachers for Pre-K we were able to monitor their snacks. Some kids had a granola bar, cheetos, a fruit roll-up AND cookies packed with their lunch. We'd tell them they could only pick one. We were also able to teach the kids to eat healthy. By the end of the year they would hold their food up and ask, "Ms. Elisha, is this good for my body?" Hopefully what we taught them about nutrition will stick with them. We even noticed the parent's were catching on too. We saw more attempts by the parents to be healthy. They'd pack more fruit and yogurt instead of fruit roll-ups. Obviously, those items weren't ideal for their children's health, but it was a step in the right direction:)

 
 +14 Points           
 
Author of the Article
BY Witch Doctor   
  
[ Joined on 09/06 ]
[ Posted on March 15, 2007 ]
Post Reply
If we are going to have a positive effect on the food industry, we have to ensure what we are saying is in fact true.  I take the liberty to re-post a comment from "talldrinkofwater1" under "10 Things Your Butcher Won't Tell You":

"As a past employee of a cattle feedlot where beef are fed grain to ready the animal for slaughter, I was on ground level in vaccinating and treating these animals.  All vaccines, antibiotics, and growth hormones have withdrawl dates.  Every person and operation that uses these substances keeps very close records of each animal and everything that they have recieved.  All animals are generally way past this withdrawl date and those that have to be slaughtered before the withdrawl date never go into circulation for human consumption.  The animals that recieve the vaccines, antibiotics and growth hormones are well past the withdrawl date and therefore their systems have processed and utilized them.  These substances are not in their systems anymore, or they could not be used for human consumption, and therefore would not even hit the grocery store shelves."

We know feedlot cattle are grown in pathetic conditions, and that antibiotics are used to allow these pathetic conditions to continue, but we should not be saying that our food is loaded with antibiotics - that is not the issue.  The issue is that our feedlot animals are loaded with antibiotics while they are growing.

And to those who are concerned about growth hormone (GH) in the food supply, all doctors know that growth hormone cannot be obtained by ingesting it - it is impossible.  That is why GH has to be injected.  It makes no sense to inject it just prior to slaughter, and the required washout period provides add'l margin, since GH is metabolized out of the animal.  So GH in beef/milk is not making children grow faster.  But it's use in feedlot cattle is still a problem.

Duane
 

 +5 Points           
 
Author of the Article
BY David Whitehouse   
  
[ Joined on 01/07 ]
Author of the Article [ Posted on March 15, 2007 ]
 
I take issue with what you are saying. Even though you were an employee, and even though you know those protocols are strictly followed in regards to "washout" times, I need to ask, who sets those times, and who defines those protocols? I would bet that some veterinarians on the payroll of the FDA, USDA, and EPA are setting them, and if the past 60 years of government swinging door policy with industry is telling us anything, it is that the protocols have very little to do with optimum health, of the animal and of those consuming the animal, and more to do with industry's, meaning big lot producers', bottom line. And even if qualified and honest veterinarians set standards, too often I have read about upper management rewriting standards to satisfy big lot practices while still being allowed to say those standards were written by qualified vets. Please never forget: USDA, FDA, EPA = Big Business.

 +2 Points           
 
Author of the Article
BY Witch Doctor   
  
[ Joined on 09/06 ]
Author of the Article [ Posted on March 15, 2007 ]
 
David - I take no issue with what you said.  I don't put my faith in bureacratic entities either, public or private.

I have a tendency to want to temper some conversations with contrary evidence.  Also, I don't like to just repeat the mantra that is already being said, which can be boring and add little.

I have noticed that when I become polarized in one direction, because I am convinced I am right and that it is for a good cause, I tend to start believing unquestioningly(?) in everything I hear that supports my position.  Then when my brain gets loaded up with enough BS, I start to see inconsistencies with what I've learned.

I also tend to believe that all people (even bureacrats and corporate executives), with relatively few exceptions, are good and want to do what's right .  They have kids, care about our country, etc... I have found in my various professional settings that most people are very diligent about what they do.  So correct information becomes the key, so they can do right.  As for me, I want to make sure my education is true and not just a compilation of what I've heard, even from "experts" that I want to agree with.

I still believe it doesn't make sense that there is an appreciable amount of antibiotics or added GH in meat and milk, and I further believe if there is some, after cooking, stomach acids, enzymes, etc... it is of little consequence to us.  Also, don't forget the administered amount of antibiotics is dissipated thoughout that large animal, and we only eat maybe 0.02% of the cow in a serving.  So even if they just got their injection,  the amount we pick up is vanishingly small.  I believe the real problem is the intrinsic health of the cow, it's fatty acid composition, diseased liver, etc... that are all deleteriously effected by the food they eat, their growth conditions, antibiotics and growth hormone.

Just my opinion.
Duane

 
 +13 Points           
 
Author of the Article