FREE Subscription The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter   
Cancer Vaccine Not Safe

New information about the human papillomavirus (HPV) cervical cancer vaccine Gardasil has raised serious questions about its effectiveness.

Although Gardasil blocked almost 100 percent of infections by two strains of HPV, it only reduced the incidence of cervical cancer precursors by 17 percent.

One possible reason is that many of the women examined to obtain this information had already been exposed to the virus. But Gardasil may also, by blocking only specific strains, allow other varieties of HPV to flourish.

The vaccine's manufacturer, Merck, has said that the vaccine reduces the number of pre-cancerous lesions caused by HPV. But some have pointed out that Merck's study was not long enough to demonstrate the vaccine's effectiveness; it only lasted three years, although it was examining a disease that can take decades to develop.

New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 356, No. 19, May 10, 2007: 1991-1993 (Free Full-Text Article)

Sun-Sentinel.com May 10, 2007


Dr. Mercola's Comment:

I suspect this information may prompt some state legislatures to reconsider their positions on the mandatory human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine requirements now being considered in many states all over the United States.

These findings that question the need for young girls to be vaccinated for HPV with Gardasil certainly aren't surprising to me. Drug treatments often cause more problems than they solve, and it now appears like blocking certain HPV strains may open the door to newer, more virulent strains once considered to be "minor" factors, negating any health benefit the vaccine may offer.

All this attention paid to a faulty and, perhaps, very dangerous vaccine is all the more amazing when you consider that the immune systems of most women are strong enough to beat these infections on their own. A New England Journal of Medicine study also found that the use of condoms reduces the incidence of HPV by 70 percent.

In addition to wise sexual practices, women can protect themselves from HPV by boosting their immune systems naturally by:

Related Articles:




Did you find this article interesting?
Article's Comment     ( 43 Comments )
 
 
 +35 Points           
 
Author of the Article
BY Josh Rubin   
  
[ Joined on 06/06 ]
[ Posted on May 10, 2007 ]
Post Reply

It still fascinates me how "they" always focus on the symptom of a bigger problem. So "they" see HPV as a problem, so "they" develop something in order to wipe it out? Why not work backwards and try to figure out where it is coming from?From all my reading and research, I have to somewhat disagree with the findings in articles supporting that cervical cancer is caused by just HPV.

"Women are much more likely to get cervical cancer if they have been on the pill." Dr. Lee

A pap smear tests form cancerous or precancerous cells on the cervix. Therer are 5 classes: 1) normal 2) inflammation or irritation 3) cervical dysplasia 4)some pre or cancerous cells 5) invasive cancer. The problem with this test according to Dr. Lee is that there are a lot of false-positive's, giving a more serious rating than there already is. According to Dr. Lee, positive findings in a pap smear happen from: traumatic sex, tampons, condoms, smoking, douches and spermicides on condoms. As well, progesterone deficiency can also contribute to cervical dysplasia secondary to making the cervix more susceptible to inflammation and irritation (secondary to the women being estrogen dominant).

So most MD's look at cervical dysplasia as the byproduct from HPV. In my opinion from treating so many women that are estrogen dominant, have low progesterone levels, smoke, have sex, use condoms, etc, what do you think the cause might be? I am not saying these are the only reasons, but why not consider them before taking a vaccine?

"We know that the use of oral contraceptives increases the risk of cervical dysplasia by AT LEAST 50% and the risk of cervical cancer by AT LEAST 25%." Dr. Lee

 

 +12 Points           
 
Author of the Article
BY Witch Doctor   
  
[ Joined on 09/06 ]
Author of the Article [ Posted on May 11, 2007 ]
 
Katy B. - and it goes further.  Kids having sex means promiscuity and self-indulgence without responsibility.  This is carried into married life, if they even get married.  Sex for adventure instead of love and procreation means more sexual "affairs".  Affairs devastate children and destroy families.  Devastated kids grow up and become depressed and emotionally wrecked adults, who want to get it together but only have their parents and society for role models.  It spells d-o-o-m for many.  They even grow to hate and resent those whose have good families and traditions.

Witch Doctor says: It is not nice to make a fool of Mother Tradition.

 +6 Points           
 
Author of the Article
BY JoyWAHM   
  
[ Joined on 03/07 ]
Author of the Article [ Posted on May 26, 2007 ]
 
I'm not sure you quite understand KatyB.

The fact is promiscuity causes all sorts of std's and other problems. People who wait until marriage for sex and are faithful during marriage do not get std's and the like. That's a fact. The best way to help young women to avoid the HPV virus is to teach them abstinance until marriage. And yes, perhaps a few will have sex anyway, but today it is so accepted and allowed and convenient that it is a rare thing for a youth to remain a virgin until marriage. What are we teaching our next generation. They are not learning responsibility and self-mastery. They are learning the opposite and the  schools encourage it. Not only that but we expect them to be promiscuous (sp), children often act according to those expectations (not the expectations you lecture them about, the ones they can discern you have of them and that they see in your example).
I remained virtuous before marriage and do not regret it at all. My marriage is the better for it and my example is set for my children, and I don't have to worry about many diseases. How many people who abstain from premarital sex grow up and regret that-yet I know of many who don't abstain in their youth who wish they had but you can't undo that.

Joyce

www.familyathome.org

 +3 Points           
 
Author of the Article
BY kewlmom   
  
[ Joined on 06/07 ]
Author of the Article [ Posted on June 26, 2007 ]
 
Vaccines scare me I don't vaccinate my kids after an adverse reaction and feel it is the right decision. I am dealing with cervical cancer right now. I just want to address Joyce who remained a vrigin and was in a long term marriage. My only partner was my husband I married at 19. I felt like Joyce (I know you will think not me) that I was safe from std's after 22 years of marriage and 4 children I discovered my husband was having an affair and not protecting me. I never even had a mildly abnormal pap in my life. My first pap after the discovery of the affair was high grade squamous. It turned out my husband's affair partner had cervical cancer and is undergoing treatment. So you are not safe!

            
 
Author of the Article
BY Thanks Pataks   
  
[ Joined on 06/06 ]
Author of the Article [ Posted on May 27, 2007 ]
 
Hi Josh

Can you tell me who Dr Lee is and where you got these specific facts on cervical cancer and the pill?

Cheers

 -12 Points           
 
Author of the Article
BY Lloyd Fielder, D.C.