FREE Subscription The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter   
Consumer Group Calls for Ban on Mercury Fillings

Echoing the concerns I've been voicing for some time, consumer activists are pressing the FDA for at least a partial ban on the use of silver amalgam fillings for cavities, because they contain toxic mercury. Their request comes despite a recent FDA determination that mercury fillings don't harm patients, except in cases where they have allergic reactions.

However, the facts speak quite clearly. Silver amalgam fillings contain 50 percent mercury, and mercury vapor is released into the body when you chew and brush your teeth. It's known that significant levels of mercury exposure can lead to brain and kidney damage, and harm fetuses and growing children. Studies have found people with these fillings can have mercury vapor concentrations 10 times higher than those in people without them, and that mercury levels in the blood, urine and body tissues rise the more mercury fillings a person has.

Further, 95 percent of people with disorders of the central nervous system such as multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, paralysis and migraines have mercury-containing fillings. So the consumer group's call for at least a partial ban, and an immediate ban for pregnant women and children, is a wise move.

Personally, I don't believe silver amalgam fillings should be used, and I strongly advise patients to remove them. However, I only recommend having them removed by an experienced biological dentist, otherwise you risk having more mercury deposited in your brain when the fillings are drilled out.

Washington Post September 7, 2006




Did you find this article interesting?
Article's Comment     ( 15 Comments )
 
 
 +5 Points           
 
Author of the Article
BY Jennifer_ Voncannon   
  
[ Joined on 09/06 ]
[ Posted on September 29, 2006 ]
Post Reply
It's about time something was done about the mercury in fillings.
 

 -1 Points           
 
Author of the Article
BY Laserman   
  
[ Joined on 06/06 ]
Author of the Article [ Posted on June 18, 2007 ]
 


Ban the amalgam!

 
 +4 Points           
 
Author of the Article
BY lvlks   
  
[ Joined on 11/06 ]
[ Posted on November 13, 2006 ]
Post Reply
When I lived in the Midwest several years ago, I became quite ill and decided to get my amalgams removed by a biological dentist. I went to your clinic to pursue chelation therapy afterwards- as you speak highly of Dr. Klinghardt and his protocal. My first visit at your clinic was with a physician who claimed chelation was too harsh and refused to do it.  (You, Dr. Mercola, speak highly of chelation therapy on your website. I left. Went back many months later after finding I had Lyme Disease and this same physician didn't feel comfortable treating me. You have a great website, but your clinic doesn't leave much to be desired.

 
 +4 Points           
 
Author of the Article
BY drjoey2   
  
[ Joined on 10/06 ]
[ Posted on October 28, 2006 ]
Post Reply
My question to this issue is: If mercury fillings were so dangerous wouldn't the dentists be demonstrating signs of illness as they work and have worked with mercury for years?
 

 +4 Points           
 
Author of the Article
BY Sally_Carr   
  
[ Joined on 06/06 ]
Author of the Article [ Posted on November 12, 2006 ]
 
There are plenty of studies showing dental assistants and dentists have negative chronic health effects.  See http://www.home.earthlink.net/~berniew1/damspr6.html for an excellent article, complete with references. 

The International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology (http://iaomt.com ) has a lot of good info on this.  You can read their scientific response to the American Dental Association's 1990 talking points about what to say when your patient's ask about mercury by going to IAOMT's site and selecting the menu points Articles/Mercury/A Scientific Response to ADA's 1990 Special Report.



 +3 Points           
 
Author of the Article
BY Maria12020