FREE Subscription The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter   
How Monsanto Poisons Science at the Cost of Your Health

If you believe, as I do, the mega-drug cartel is truly evil, the behind-the-scenes business tactics used by Monsanto to poison our foods with genetically modified (GM) replacements make them look like Mother Teresa. So, how did Monsanto ever come to wield so much power?

This frightening story from David Icke.com describes one of the primary strategies behind Monsanto's successful business practices: Confusing the argument against GM foods, for example, by peppering the debate with "science-speak" to muddy any clear representation of the facts before the hazards are ever realized.

Part and parcel of this strategy and Monsanto's success has been finding "independent" scientists willing to sell the company line, like the late Sir Richard Doll who was paid handsomely for two decades by the company to defend such monstrosities as Agent Orange.

However, if you were on the "wrong" side of the debate, as Dr. Arpad Pusztai was, your career as a world renowned expert in GM foods would eventually be in shambles, all thanks to the Monsanto's multi-national influence.

Above all, don't be confused about the global GM blight that taints some 70 percent of the processed foods you find at your corner grocery store. Before you go shop for foods again, do your homework by reviewing my tips for staying clear of GM foods.

Can You Really Trust Monsanto? -- How They Corrupted Science





Did you find this article interesting?
Article's Comment     ( 20 Comments )
 
 
 +5 Points           
 
Author of the Article
BY Russ Bianchi   
  
[ Joined on 09/06 ]
[ Posted on December 20, 2006 ]
Post Reply

A helpful video that one can find at places like, Mercola.com, or NetFlix, or your favorite local video store, is The Future of Food This documentary gives, in simple and understandable language, how bad, corrupt, and dumb-downed, most of the processed food, beverage, and pharmaceutical chain is in the USA.

I recall a few years back watching a Wednesday night edition (now canceled) segment on CBS' 60 Minutes, in which they discussed, in detail, a long term disease resistant potato Monsanto had genetically modified. 

Now as any potato farmer in Idaho, or elsewhere, will tell you, "who needs long term storage" as they already have below gound cold storage cellars, not buring any fuel, that hold potatoes in dormancy just fine thank you, with little spoilage.

Well, it so happens that an independent (non Monsanto) scientist decided to conduct a simple feeding study with 2 groups of laboratory rats.  One group got regular potatos, and the second group got the new GMO product from Monsanto at equal rates.

The Results?  Regular expected weight gain in both groups occurred, however there was a graphic image in the TV piece of the GMO potato consuming rats, all developing 5, 6, 7, and 8 limbs, spouting and growing out of their heads, backs, necks and torsos...

Yes, folks, Monsanto cannot be trusted at all, and neither can government lower paid FDA bureaucrats, allegedly reviewing and safeguarding the food chain, to assure you of any safety in such matters.

As we literally see on a DAILY basis from the wire services, and headlines, the FDA has becoma reactive organization, at best, on recalls and side effects, in food, cosmetics, ingredients, beverages, and pharmaceutical products, long after the product has HARMED or KILLED people.

So as the ancient Roman saying suggests: "Caveat emptor" (Let The Buyer Beware!)...

Take control of your own health, ask simple logical questions, like: "Do I really need to consume something I cannot spell, let alone understand what harm it might be doing to me, my children, family, or friends?", by READING INGREDIENT LABELS PRIOR to purchasing the product.

If you cannot spell the ingredient, or do not understand what it is, there is a high probability is is NOT good for you!


 
 +4 Points           
 
Author of the Article
BY moira   
  
[ Joined on 06/06 ]
[ Posted on December 20, 2006 ]
Post Reply

The problem is that corporations like Monsanto have too much money!!  The corporate form of business is not beneficial to society.  It allows for the accumulation of too much money without accountability.  This money buys power and influence. Individuals can't have the same influence on our world (unless very united) as corporations.  There is no democracy with corporations. 

Furthermore, I think it is time we citizens vote on the issues ourselves without having a "reprsentative" to deal with.  This would eliminate corporate influence. The technology is there which would make this possible.

Because of corporations we don't have clean air, water or food.  These should be a "given."  The Senator from my state always votes for big business against the environment, etc.  I would think if individuals could vote on issues themselves, the environment, etc. would stand a better chance of surviving.

 

            
 
Author of the Article
BY LucyL   
  
[ Joined on 12/06 ]
Author of the Article [ Posted on January 04, 2007 ]
 

I have great respect for what Dr. Mercola does, his ability to reach a wide audience is a testament to his dedication and committment.  And, most importantly, it is the function of change.  Right now the problem is that people want Monsanto.

Monsanto gets its money from the sale of their product to a Majority of farmers who prefer to buy it.  The farmers get the money to buy it from government subsidies.  Subsidies and government handouts are generally always supported by popular vote, as evidenced by the popularity of minimum wage hikes on the ballots last November.  Such increases can only be afforded by the largest, richest corperations that actively exploit government handout.

In other words, the American public has a habit (in democratic votes) of undermining competition, small businesses and individual accomplishments in favor of obtaining government handouts.  This is a clear and present reminder of the dangers of a purely democratic system.

Ron Paul wrote that "Democracy is simply majoritarianism which is inherently incompatible with real freedom."   "Freedom," he wrote, "is the absence of government coercion."

The answer is websites, and people like Dr. Mercola, that raise awareness and educate the public to resist the promotion of dangerous goods. 

Voices like Dr. Mercola's can be heard because of our guarantee of free speech, created under and protected from coercion by our Constitutional Republic.


 -3 Points           
 
Author of the Article
BY ne_plus_ultra_1   
  
[ Joined on 09/06 ]
Author of the Article [ Posted on January 06, 2007 ]
 
This is just about as intelligent a comment as I would expect from an Alabamer.  There are good corporations and bad ones.  How awful to label them ALL bad.

 
 +3 Points           
 
Author of the Article
BY musiclover7878   
  
[ Joined on 10/06 ]
[ Posted on January 04, 2007 ]
Post Reply

The more I learn, the more hopeless it seems. How do we fight those who own everything?


 
 +2 Points           
 
Author of the Article
BY MacD