FREE Subscription The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter   
The Cancer-Causing Breakfast Meat Strikes Again

Bacon, among the worst processed meats you could eat for your health, along with skinless chicken elevate your risk of bladder cancer, according to a new study.

Scientists monitored the health of some 135,000 patients over a 22-year period to investigate the link, during which some 800 developed bladder cancer. Bacon was the leading offender, as eating it five or more times a week increased a patient's bladder cancer risks by 59 percent. What's even more interesting is that skinless chicken also elevated one's bladder cancer risks by 52 percent.

The likely culprit that makes bacon and skinless chicken so harmful, aside from processing: The heterocyclic amines that form when meat is cooked is high temperatures.

If you're eating meat loaded with pesticides and hormones, then cook it at high temperatures, you're asking for trouble. That's why I limit my meat choices when possible to grass-fed and organic meats.

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 84, No. 5, November 2006: 1177-1183

Yahoo News November 27, 2006




Did you find this article interesting?
Article's Comment     ( 16 Comments )
 
 
 +3 Points           
 
Author of the Article
BY TinaK   
  
[ Joined on 11/06 ]
[ Posted on December 16, 2006 ]
Post Reply
Levitical guidelines flawed? I think not. Why accept them at all if you don't believe that Moses was inspired by G-d? If you accept they have merit then live by them. I think what G-d is saying here is that the pig and other banned animals aren't even considered food, forget that they are bad for you in the sense of charcoal grilled chicken.  Although the chicken is "kosher" grilling it can make it toxic an entirely different concept than eating something that was meant to be a garbage processor, not a food.  Would YOU lick your garbage can?  As for rare and raw meat, that's a no-no. Even before the Levitical Code, all the way back to Noah, we were told not to eat blood. Yuck. When Dr. Mercola said he ate raw lamb a while back I was totally grossed out and thought it's no wonder he got violently ill.  Where do we see the idea that cooking is good for us? When the Israelites were to prepare a sacrifice, it was cooked and then consumed, never consumed raw.  In fact this goes back to Genesis and the origin of Cain slaying Abel.
Even if you consider some of this a folklore, there are good concepts for healthy living.  My immune system is not the best but I feel a lot better when I observe the rules of kosher eating even beyond what is written in the Bible.  That includes mixing meat and milk.
I was not raised kosher so I do know what pork tastes like and it's very nice especially those great Italian deli meats but think about the perils of eating them, nitrates, etc.   Did you ever wonder why som many people have fatal allergic reactions to  shellfish?  Maybe the Levitical code was correct about  the  inappropriateness of eating them also.
 

 +1 Points           
 
Author of the Article
BY xyzsch   
  
[ Joined on 10/06 ]
Author of the Article [ Posted on December 17, 2006 ]
 
I don't think religious mythology has any place in a nutrition forum. You can believe what you want based on some biblical notion, but show me the scientific evidence.

 
 +1 Points           
 
Author of the Article
BY Melizzard   
  
[ Joined on 06/06 ]
[ Posted on December 16, 2006 ]
Post Reply
I'm confused with the "skinless chicken" thing.  So, are we supposed to cook chicken w/the skin on, then remove it to eat the meat, or are we supposed to eat the skin too?  And, what if we're cooking the skinless chicken on lower heat?  Does that carry the same risk?  I personally don't like to season the skin of the chicken, then remove it to eat the meat ... all the seasoning was on the skin.  So, I like to cook my chicken skinless so my seasonings are cooked into the meat. 

Any more clarification on this one point?

Thanks!
Melissa

 
            
 
Author of the Article
BY stmatthew   
  
[ Joined on 11/06 ]
[ Posted on December 17, 2006 ]
Post Reply
Bacon and the process we use to cook  will always result in the production of nitrasamines, the scientists first choice for causing cancer in laboratory animals.  Why does anyone even bother to eat it?  Also, the presumed need for the general consumption of animals is flawed.  Animals, including pigs, provide a secondary concentrated dissemination of toxins from our environment that is far more harmful than if we would ingest these directly.  The environmental toxins do not get filtered as we may think, rather they are more lethal (e.g. swordfish, et al).  Oddly, there is a reaction to choose less hostile meats and stay away from "unproven" safe sources.  This is like suggesting that we just limit the amount of poisons available.  It is analagous to saying that filtered cigarettes and a reduction in the number of cigarettes is a good alternative.

 
            
 
Author of the Article
BY Jean Dunlap   
  
[ Joined on 06/06 ]
[ Posted on December 16, 2006 ]
Post Reply

I don't eat much pork, considering the Bible prohibitions against it, tho have thought perhaps Peter being told to kill and eat prohibeted meats was not entirely an example that it was OK to associate with Gentiles!? So I eat pork on rare occasions, especially if I am served it when I am a guest somewhere.

The thing that puzzles me is this emphasis on pigs being scavengers and eating anything/everything in sight...have y'all raised chickens as we have? It seems to me they are as much scavengers as pigs?? On the farm we dumped all our kitchen refuse over the chicken yard fence, and they ate it all. And it wasn't because they were starved: there was regular chicken feed available. It's OK for chickens to eat anything/everything, but not pigs?? I'm not arguing with God [:)], just curious why chickens are OK for scavengering but not pigs.


 
            
 
Author of the Article
BY catlovr1418