FREE Subscription The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter   
The Sordid History of Monsanto Poisoning Your Milk

Over 20 years ago, experimental recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone (rBGH) dairy products made by Monsanto were sold illegally to students, staff, faculty, and patients at the University of Wisconsin.

At the time, Dr. David Kronfeld showed that much of the published research on rBGH was fraudulent. He was ridiculed by the drug companies, and he was ultimately demoted and his career nearly destroyed. The passage of time, however, has proven him correct.

For two decades, consumer groups have worked to expose the dangers of rBGH to the public. A recent breakthrough came with the May 2006 discovery that expectant U.S. mothers who consumed rBGH milk experienced problems as a result of elevated levels of Insulin-Like Growth Factor One, which has been linked to cancer.

A year later, California Dairy Inc. (CDI) announced that it would be going rBGH-free as of August 1, 2007 as a result of "consumer demand." CDI processes 45 percent of California's milk. Other dairy companies, and a number of large grocery store and restaurant chains, have also rejected rBGH.

On February 20, 2007 a petition was submitted to the FDA on behalf of the Cancer Prevention Coalition, Family Farm Defenders, and the Organic Consumers Association, requesting a suspension of rBGH approval pending a reevaluation of its human health hazards.

Organic Consumers Association March 18, 2007


Dr. Mercola's Comment:

Last fall's wave of dairy companies dropping Monsanto's rBGH, which spurs the production of milk in cows, might have led you to believe the drugging of cows was a fairly recent development. Not so, according to the Family Farm Defenders.

This group has been working for years to expose all the problems associated with bovine growth hormones. And, as you probably expected, many experts who spoke out were slammed, defamed, punished and silenced, just like Dr. Arpad Pusztai was, albeit for his concerns over genetically modified (GM) foods.

As Monsanto's public relations arm has geared up to salvage its product with a smear campaign meant to spread doubts about hormone-free milk, the Defenders, along with other groups, continue to work in the public interest by petitioning the FDA.

Monsanto's genetically modified product may be quite hazardous to your health, and, incidentally, could also account for some of the rise in the births of fraternal twins in America. And, of course, milk made with these unnatural hormones carry no labels warning you that they contain substances that will increase your risk of cancer.

Just a reminder, hormone-free or not, the milk that's best for your health isn't pasteurized and you likely won't find it in your corner grocery store. Raw milk, straight from a local dairy farmer, is your best, healthiest, safest and most nutritious option.


Related Articles:




Did you find this article interesting?
Article's Comment     ( 50 Comments )
 
 
 +79 Points           
 
Author of the Article
BY Josh Rubin   
  
[ Joined on 06/06 ]
[ Posted on March 26, 2007 ]
Post Reply
The thing that perplexus me the most is this: most of society if afraid of raw milk because of bacteria, etc., but at the same time they will drink pasteurized milk with sugar, hormones and god knows what else is in it? Are people that ignorant and fearful of self?
 

 +20 Points           
 
Author of the Article
BY Bridestein   
  
[ Joined on 12/06 ]
Author of the Article [ Posted on March 26, 2007 ]
 
Try not to be too hard on people - most of them are still plugged into the matrix. Ignorance is bliss.
But seriously, finding the truth is hard. First you have to be aware that you're not being told the truth. And if like me, you were born more than 40 years ago, you were taught to trust authority. It really doesn't occur to a lot of people that the "experts" or the government would have any kind of agenda or not know what they're talking about. Then you have to try and find the truth.  But you will not find it on the TV or radio, and rarely in the newspaper. And how do you know who to believe?
On another note, if you posted a video showing cows being commercially milked while covered in poop up to their shoulders, people would finally realize that pastuerized milk contains sterilized poop!


 +10 Points           
 
Author of the Article
BY LM36   
  
[ Joined on 12/06 ]
Author of the Article [ Posted on March 26, 2007 ]
 
Studies have concluded that  4 out of every 5 Americans are ignorant.  That is why the majortiy of Americans are obese.  People are addicted to sugar and they are lazy.  They are so lazy that they believe whatever the media tells them.  We are facing a health crisis never seen before in the history of humankind because of ignorance.  The positive note in all of this is brilliantly summed up by Mike Adams (The Health Ranger)... "Ultimately, conventional (western) medicine will collapse upon its own blatant failures, to be replaced by a new age of medicine where disease prevention -- not treatment -- keeps people healthy, vibrant and productive without bankrupting the nation in the process."    

 +9 Points           
 
Author of the Article
BY SignificantHealing.com   
  
[ Joined on 03/07 ]
Author of the Article [ Posted on April 12, 2007 ]
 
Some of the bacteria present in unpasturized milk, including human breast milk, are bacteria that is INTENDED to colonize in the digestive tract  as microflora.  This is the same microflora that we strive to nourish with yogurt and probiotics ...... so obviously, nature provided for us, man took away, and now we must supplement. 

 +8 Points           
 
Author of the Article
BY charshan   
  
[ Joined on 04/07 ]
Author of the Article [ Posted on April 12, 2007 ]
 
Love the points you all make.

Our doctor, who is one of the most "progressive" in the area, suggested that we bagin giving our twin girls milk when they turned 1. They have always been slender for their height (the doctor calls this "underweight") and he wanted to ensure that they kept on gaining. We tried regular commercial-dairy milk for a few months, and then I was able to find a farm with some available goat shares, so we switched to fresh milk.

So far: no listeria or other diseases! It's delicious and the girls and we love it. Differences between it and processed milk: the girls had a lot of allergy symptoms with processed (icky noses, nasty diapers), whereas those are not present when they drink raw milk. And all of the hype about how contaminated raw milk is compared to pasteurized makes me laugh: I've learned via a scientific method which milk is "cleaner" -- the "Sippy Test." Take two sippy cups. Fill one with processed milk. FIll the other with raw milk. Slide them under beds in two different rooms. Your nose will tell you when the milk in each begins to sour and rot. (The processed milk will "turn" within hours; the raw milk will not start to smell bad for days.)

There is a huge profit motive for keeping the public uneducated about the dangers of milk processing, because the process itself ensures a longer shelf life for the milk. What you pay for that bonus for dairy farmers and distributors is a complete sacrifice in the power of this really nutritious food with its readily available vitamins, micronutrients, and minerals.

I consider the money we spend on raw milk some of the best dollars I spend, and recommend it to everyone. Especially those with small children with stomach, allergy problems, etc.

Best,

Laura

 +6 Points           
 
Author of the Article